IMT: Por que medir 1 cm se podemos medir tudo?

AQUI LINK
.

Carotid Plaque Burden as a Measure of Subclinical Atherosclerosis

.

Results  The mean age was 68.8 years, and 65.3% of subjects had intermediate Framingham Risk Score (6% to 20% 10-year risk). Carotid plaques were identified in 78% of cases, abnormal ABI in 10%, AAD >20 mm in 28%, and coronary calcium in 68% of participants. Carotid plaque burden was found to correlate stronger with CACS (chi-square 450, p < 0.0001) than did cIMT (chi-square 24, p < 0.0001), AAD (chi-square 2.9, p = 0.091), and ABI (chi-square 35.2, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions  In the BioImage study, a new 3-dimensional–based ultrasound method identified more carotid plaques than in previous studies. Compared to other methods, carotid plaque burden was the strongest cross-sectional predictor of CACS, and its clinical utility as predictor of future cardiovascular events is being evaluated in the BioImage study. (BioImage Study: A Clinical Study of Burden of Atherosclerotic Disease in an At-Risk Population; NCT00738725)
.
.
É possível medir toda a artéria e avaliar amplamente as carótidas .
Só poderia ser melhor mesmo.
.

Deixe uma resposta